Settlement pattern corruption problem in rural areas and alternative approaches: Beyşehir – Emen, Turkey experiences

Authors

  • Sinan Levend Selcuk University
  • Mehmet Çağlar Meşhur Selcuk University
  • Neslihan Serdaroğlu Sağ Selcuk University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7480/iphs.2016.6.1322

Abstract

Rural areas are under different types of pressure due to their geographical locations in the country, distance to the urban areas and their natural and cultural features. Managing of this pressure is important in terms of conservation of settlement character and sustainability of spatial features of the rural areas. 
In Turkey, different approaches and models have been developed for the rural areas since the first years of republic. These policies, which were produced with names such as community development, central village, village city, agriculture city, have contributed to social and economic development of rural areas. However, spatial corruption of rural areas could not be prevented although economic development was created with difference policies and strategies. In this context, the main objective of this study is to examine factors causing spatial corruption of rural areas. In light of the findings obtained, approaches on conservation and sustainability of rural areas were discussed. 
In order to discuss and develop solutions for this problem, a protocol was signed between the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Karadeniz Technical University and Selcuk University in 2010. The project named " Rural Planning Focusing on Conservation: A Proposal Model" targeted to be developed with the cooperation of these institutions was supported by Turkey Scientific and Technical Research Organization and this project was completed in 2015.
Within the project, field researches have been made in two different areas of Turkey by two Universities. In light of the findings, character of the settlements were determined and these findings have been entry in planning works in two example settlements selected. 
Findings obtained with the field research made by the project team have been base for the structural plan study in Emen, which is in Beysehir Lake's basin, one of the most important fresh water basins in Turkey. The reason why Emen selected in the project is that it has important values in terms of natural and cultural landscaping.
The most important subject that should be emphasized within the findings obtained as result of the study is that the rural settlements are different than urban areas in terms of their road width and tissues, parcel sizes, floor area ratio and building heights. Another result is that "rural-specific" approaches, which would direct spatial development and construction in rural areas, have not been developed in Turkey. Supervision of spatial development and construction in rural areas with regulations and laws on development of urban areas has caused corruption in settlement character/fabric of the rural areas. Thus, "rural-specific" approaches should be developed for conserving settlement fabric/pattern in rural areas for increasing resilience against construction pressure.

References

Chandel, Ajitesh Singh. “A Geographical Study of Rural Settlement Types and Factors Affecting The Rural Settlements in Bilaspur District (Himachal Pradesh).” International Indexed and Refereed Research Journal IV, no. 42 (2013): 1-3.

Dıraor, Burcu Miraç. “Katılım Öncesi AB Fonları ve Kırsal Kalkınma.” Uzmanlık Tezi. Ankara: DPT, 2008.

DPT. Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı, Kırsal Kalkınma Politikaları Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu. Ankara: DPT, 2006a.

DPT. Ulusal Kırsal Kalkınma Stratejisi. Ankara: DPT, 2006b, 5-6.

Ekim, Recep Murat. “Avrupa Birliği Kırsal Kalkınma Politikaları ve Türkiye‟nin Uyumu.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İzmir: DEU, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2006.

Ellis, Frank, and Stephen Biggs. “Evolving Themes in Rural Development 1950s-2000s.” Development Policy Review 19, no. 4 (2001): 437-448.

Göksu, Çetin. Kümelenmiş Kentsel Sistemler Mekan Örgütlenmesi İçin Bir Model Araştırması. Trabzon: KTÜ Basımevi, 1982.

Köroğlu, Tunga. “Kent Kır Ayrımında Kırın Planlanması Sorunsalı.” Planlama (TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası) 4 (2003): 29 -34.

Öğdül, Hürriyet. “Kırsal Alanlara Yeni Yaklaşımlar.” Planlama (TMMOB Şehir Pl. Odası), no. 1 (2002): 45-50.

Öğdül, Hürriyet, Habip, Uluçay, and Serkan Öngel. Kent Çevresindeki Kırsal Alanlarda Değişim Biçimleri. İstanbul: SOBAG – 105K076, 2007.

Sotte, Frank. An Evolutionary Approach to Rural Development: Some Lessons for the Policymaker. Ancona: Collana Appunti, 2003.

Taraklı, Duran. “Tarım, Kalkınma ve İnsan.” Tarım Haftası 94 Sempozyumu. Ankara: TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası, 1995. 63.

Taraklı, Duran. “Tarımda Üretim ve Gelişme.” Planlama (TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası) 4 (2003): 4-16.

UNECE, EUROSTAT, FAO, OECD, and The World Bank. Rural Household’s Livelihood and Well-Being: Statistics on Rural Development and Agriculture Household Income. Geneva, 2005.

Urry, John. Mekanları Tüketmek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30