Spolia and the Open Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.16.2.6076Abstract
This article discusses the possibilities of signification in architectural interventions involving historical remnants, focusing on the notions of spolia and of opera aperta. The notion of spolia has been the province of art history since the Renaissance. In bringing it to the field of architectural design, the focus will shift from the historical realm to the conceptual possibilities opened up by spolia in architectural practice. The aim is to analyse the association between the creative reuse of and intervention in historical remnants and the multiplication of possible significations through various examples. Methodologically, the article expands the linguistic drive of the contemporary debate on spolia to the structural linguistics upon which Umberto Eco built the poststructuralist concept of open work. More precisely, the essay resorts to the notions of ‘sign’ and ‘sign structure’ as a vehicle to explore the possibilities for the semantic and syntactical openness of spolia. Toning in with Eco’s arguments on the open work, the openness associated with spolia will be seen as dependent on the loosening of the formal and typological structures of established architectural codes.
References
Barthes, Roland. Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes. Translated by Richard Howard. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1994.
Bois, Yve-Alain. ‘The Semiology of Cubism’. In Picasso and Braque. A Symposium, edited by Lynn Zelevansky, 169-208. New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1992.
Brandenburg, Hugo. ‘The Use of Older elements in the Architecture of Fourth- and Fifth-Century Rome: A Contribution to the Evaluation of Spolia’. Reuse Value. Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Richard Brilliant and Dale Kinney, 53-73. New York: Ashgate, 2011.
Brilliant, Richard and Kinney, Dale, eds. Reuse Value. Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine. New York: Ashgate, 2011.
Brilliant, Richard. ‘I piedestalli del giardino di Boboli: spolia in se, spolia in re’. Prospettiva no. 31 (1982): 2-17.
Eco, Umberto. The Open Work. Translated by Anna Cancogni. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Elsner, Jas. ‘From the culture of Spolia to the Cult of Relics: The Arch of Constantine and the Genesis of Late Antique Forms’. Papers of the British School at Rome, vol. 68 (2000): 149-184.
Esch, Arnold. ‘On the Reuse of Antiquity: The Perspectives of the Archaeologist and of the Historian’. In Reuse Value. Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Richard Brilliant and Dale Kinney, 14–31. New York: Ashgate, 2011.
Esch, Arnold. ‘Spolien. Zur Wiederverwendung antiker Baustücke und Skulpturen im mittelalterlichen Italien’, Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 51 (1969): 1-64.
Foster, Hal. ‘(Post)Modern Polemics’. New German Critique, 33 (Fall 1984): 67-78.
Frascari, Marco. ‘Carlo Scarpa in Magna Graecia: The Abatellis Pallace in Palermo’. AA Files, no. 9 (Summer 1985): 3-9.
Goffi, Federica. ‘Architecture In Conversion: The Singular Door to the Practice of Carlo Scarpa’. Oblique, vol. 2 (2017): 42-53.
Grassi, Giorgio. ‘Roman Theatre of Sagunto’. In Giorgio Grassi. Architecture, Dead Language (Milan: Electa, 1986).
Hansen, Maria Fabricius. The Eloquence of Appropriation. Prolegomena to an Understanding of Spolia in Early Christian Rome. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 2003.
Jevtic, Ivana and Yalman, Suzan, eds. Spolia Reincarnated. Afterlives of objects, Materials, and Spaces in Anatolia from Antiquity to the Ottoman Era, 10th International Anamed Annual Symposium. Istanbul: Koç University; Anatolian Center for Anatolian Civilizations, 2018.
Jones, Mark Wilson. ‘Genesis and Mimesis: The Design of the Arch of Constantine in Rome’. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 59, no. 2 (March 2000): 50-77
Kinney, Dale. ‘Rape or Restitution of the Past? Interpreting Spolia’. In The Art of Interpreting, edited by Susan Scott, 54-56. Pennsilvania: PSUP, 1995.
Kinney, Dale. ‘Roman Architectural Spolia’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 145, no. 2 (June 2001): 138.
Kinney, Dale. ‘Spolia, Damnatio and Renovatio Memoriae’. MAAR, 42 (1997): 119-122.
Kinney, Dale. ‘The Concept of Spolia’. In A Companion to Medieval Art: Romanesque and Gothic in Northern Europe, edited by Conrad Rudolph, 233-252. Malden, Massashusets: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Krauss, Rosalind E. ‘The Motivation of the Sign’. In Picasso and Braque. A Symposium, edited by Lynn Zelevansky, 261–86. New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1992.
Lieto, Alba Di, ed.. I disegni di Carlo Scarpa per Castelvecchio. Venice: Regioni del Veneto; Marsilio, 2006.
Linazasoro, José Ignacio. Memoria de una búsqueda. Sobre escritos y proyectos. Valladolid: ETSAVA, 2019.
Linazasoro, José Ignacio; Romano, Daniel Dávila, and Niebla, Leonardo Tamargo. Interview. TC Cuadernos, no. 148 (2020): 9.
Liverani, Paolo. ‘Reading Spolia in Late Antiquity and Contemporary Perception’. In Reuse Value. Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Richard Brilliant and Dale Kinney, 33-51. New York: Ashgate, 2011.
Mazzariol, Giuseppe. ‘Da Carlo Scarpa: due porte, l'ombra, la luce’. Venezia Arti (1987): 73-81.
Mazzariol, Giuseppe. ‘Opere dell’architetto Carlo Scarpa’, L’architettura cronache e storia, no. 3 (1955): 340-341, 347.
McCarter, Robert . Carlo Scarpa. London: Phaidon, 2013.
Murphy, Richard. Carlos Scarpa and Castelvecchio Revisited. Edinburgh: Breakfast Mission Publishing, 2017.
Niewöhner, Philipp. ‘Varietas, Spolia, and the End of Antiquity in East and West’. In Spolia Reincarnated. Afterlives of objects, Materials, and Spaces in Anatolia from Antiquity to the Ottoman Era, edited by Ivana Jevtic, and Suzan Yalman, 237-257. Istanbul: Koç University; Anatolian Center for Anatolian Civilizations, 2018.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs’. In Philosophical Writings of Pierce, edited by Justus Buchler, 99-119. New York: Dover Publications, 1955.
Preziosi, Donald. ‘Collecting / Museums’. In Critical Terms for Art History, 2nd ed., edited by Robert S. Nelson and Richard Shiff, 407-418. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
Soroka, Ellen. ‘Point & Counterpoint: the art of interface in the work of Carlo Scarpa’. Modulus 19 (1989): 42-65.
Tafuri, Manfredo. ‘Il frammento, la ‘figura’, il gioco. Carlo Scarpa e la cultura architettonica italiana’. In Carlo Scarpa, Opera Completa, edited by Francesco Dal Co and Giuseppe Mazzariol, 72-95. Milan: Electa, 1984.
Uytterhoeven, Inge . ‘Spolia, -iorum, n.: From Spoils of War to Reused Building Materials: The History of a Latin Term’. In Spolia Reincarnated. Afterlives of objects, Materials, and Spaces in Anatolia from Antiquity to the Ottoman Era, edited by Ivana Jevtic, and Suzan Yalman, 25-50. Istanbul: Koç University; Anatolian Center for Anatolian Civilizations, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Armando Rabaça
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
